![]() ![]() They didn't have any film characteristics to them. What I wanted to say is that those dcp files, in case of VSCO, were just alternative camera profiles, similar to Adobe's. dcp files associated with them, the ACR/LR adjustments were applied on top of VSCO's own profile files, not on top of adobe's standard files When you clicked on a VSCO preset, the preset contained instructions to change the HSL/Curve/etc within LR/ACR but they also had individual. Also I did read some place that presets are best for jpegs and profiles for raw files. While more expensive than Mastin with all the profiles included it’s actually cheaper than Mastin. I agree profiles are more “advanced” than presets and is an option I prefer as usually it can be adjusted to the amount of the profile you prefer. These profiles, however, seem to be optimized for editing JPEG images and may not take advantage of the extra capabilities of a RAW file. ![]() ![]() The LR CC profiles will also sync to LR Mobile. The Lightroom Desktop presets should work on both LR Classic and LR CC. However, the Mastin presets look very good, and the benefit of the profile browser is less important with only a few presets in each package. I also prefer the way I can browse the profiles in the LR profile browser. Currently I only use profiles, and almost exclusively from RNI. Unlike presets, profiles can make more advanced adjustments and create looks that are not possible with the Lightroom controls on their own. Unfortunately I have no experience with Mastin Labs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |